California's attorney general has filed a lawsuit against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, demanding that the 2 companies respond to questions as part of a state investigation.
The office of Attorney General Kamala Harris, has filed the lawsuit, which demands that, the 2 mortgage firms, which own 60% of the mortgages in California, respond to questions on the companies’ contribution to the mortgage crisis. The California Attorney General wants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to respond to 51 investigative subpoenas, asking them to identify all the homes in California that they have foreclosed.
The lawsuit is also asking the 2 mortgage companies to disclose whether they have any information about the reduced value of those residential properties due to criminal activity, including drug dealing and prostitution or the location of weapons on those properties. The mortgage firms are also being asked to disclose whether they are in full compliance with civil rights laws that protect certain groups of people, like members of the Armed Forces and minority communities from unlawful convictions and foreclosures.
California personal bankruptcy lawyers will definitely monitor the proceedings in this lawsuit. At the crux of the lawsuit is a question about whether states have the right to question mortgage firms which are governed by federal law. However, the California Attorney General says that since Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac owned properties in California, they are subject to California laws.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the federal government in an attempt to save them from collapse in 2008. The 2 companies were placed in a conservatorship under the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The agency’s attorneys say that the subpoenas presented by the California Attorney General's office are vague and ambiguous. The companies also claim that the state attorney general does not have the power to issue subpoenas against the federal agency.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
American Airlines Files for Bankruptcy Protection
One of the last major airline companies in the United States to avoid Chapter 11 has finally decided to restructure to begin anew. AMR Corp., the parent company of American Airlines announced that it has filed for bankruptcy protection.
According to the company, the reason for the bankruptcy filing is high labor costs as well as the unstable economy. One of the main goals that the company is aiming for out of its bankruptcy proceedings is lowered labor costs. The company has recently been in talks with labor unions, but those talks were stopped earlier this month.
Until last Tuesday when it filed for bankruptcy protection, the airline was the last major carrier network in the United States to avoid bankruptcy since the September 11 attacks. Many of American Airlines’ competitors have dealt with their financial difficulties by dealing directly with labor problems. They have renegotiated labor contracts, and restructured debt by consulting with California bankruptcy attorneys. Some of these airlines have been able to turn their balance sheets around since then, reporting solid profit margins.
AMR Corp. declared a net loss of $804 million in the first 9 months of 2011. That was more than double the company's losses during the same time last year. Another factor in the company’s financial troubles has been increased competition in the airline industry. In recent years, competitors like Southwest Airlines have grabbed a major slice of market share. In order to meet competition, the company was forced to increase its borrowing, pledging all assets, leaving it heavily in debt.
According to the company, the airline will function as normal throughout the bankruptcy and restructuring process. Passengers are not expected to be affected by the bankruptcy proceedings. All flights will operate as scheduled, and all frequent flyer programs will be honored.
According to the company, the reason for the bankruptcy filing is high labor costs as well as the unstable economy. One of the main goals that the company is aiming for out of its bankruptcy proceedings is lowered labor costs. The company has recently been in talks with labor unions, but those talks were stopped earlier this month.
Until last Tuesday when it filed for bankruptcy protection, the airline was the last major carrier network in the United States to avoid bankruptcy since the September 11 attacks. Many of American Airlines’ competitors have dealt with their financial difficulties by dealing directly with labor problems. They have renegotiated labor contracts, and restructured debt by consulting with California bankruptcy attorneys. Some of these airlines have been able to turn their balance sheets around since then, reporting solid profit margins.
AMR Corp. declared a net loss of $804 million in the first 9 months of 2011. That was more than double the company's losses during the same time last year. Another factor in the company’s financial troubles has been increased competition in the airline industry. In recent years, competitors like Southwest Airlines have grabbed a major slice of market share. In order to meet competition, the company was forced to increase its borrowing, pledging all assets, leaving it heavily in debt.
According to the company, the airline will function as normal throughout the bankruptcy and restructuring process. Passengers are not expected to be affected by the bankruptcy proceedings. All flights will operate as scheduled, and all frequent flyer programs will be honored.
Monday, October 24, 2011
Increase in California Foreclosures as Talks between State and Federal Officials Stall
Banks increased foreclosure activity in August, contributing to an increasing number of foreclosures in the third quarter of 2011. This brings to a close a nearly year-long let-up in foreclosure activity across the state.
According to DataQuick, the number of notices of default filed increased by close to 26% over the second quarter. During the second quarter, the number of notices of default filed had dropped to a three-year low. During the quarter that ended September 30, an estimated 71,275 notices of default were filed against California homes. For any homeowner or California foreclosure alternative lawyer, filing of a notice of default denotes the first step in the foreclosure process.
Most of the homes that are now going into foreclosure were purchased with loans that were made between 2005 and 2007, the peak of the housing bubble. During that time, many loans were made to people who did not have the means to repay them, resulting in numerous foreclosures.
Investigations found that banks had used faulty documentation and shoddy practices in order to speed up loan approvals. Additionally, there were numerous investigations into foreclosure and mortgage practices that led to a backlog of distressed properties. Now, banks have accelerated foreclosure activity again.
The increase in foreclosures also comes as talks between California and federal officials over a broad foreclosure settlement have stalled. The talks involve the five largest national mortgage service providers, and state attorney generals. California recently decided to drop out of the talks, and resolve the foreclosure crisis in the state on its own. California Atty. Gen, Kamala Harris has been unhappy with the negotiations with mortgage service providers because she believes that the banks are being offered broad relief from legal liability in these foreclosures.
According to DataQuick, the number of notices of default filed increased by close to 26% over the second quarter. During the second quarter, the number of notices of default filed had dropped to a three-year low. During the quarter that ended September 30, an estimated 71,275 notices of default were filed against California homes. For any homeowner or California foreclosure alternative lawyer, filing of a notice of default denotes the first step in the foreclosure process.
Most of the homes that are now going into foreclosure were purchased with loans that were made between 2005 and 2007, the peak of the housing bubble. During that time, many loans were made to people who did not have the means to repay them, resulting in numerous foreclosures.
Investigations found that banks had used faulty documentation and shoddy practices in order to speed up loan approvals. Additionally, there were numerous investigations into foreclosure and mortgage practices that led to a backlog of distressed properties. Now, banks have accelerated foreclosure activity again.
The increase in foreclosures also comes as talks between California and federal officials over a broad foreclosure settlement have stalled. The talks involve the five largest national mortgage service providers, and state attorney generals. California recently decided to drop out of the talks, and resolve the foreclosure crisis in the state on its own. California Atty. Gen, Kamala Harris has been unhappy with the negotiations with mortgage service providers because she believes that the banks are being offered broad relief from legal liability in these foreclosures.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
California Democrats Call on Federal Administration to Take Action on Foreclosures
Frustration over the state’s continually high number of foreclosures is causing concern among California foreclosure lawyers and lawmakers too. California House Democrats last week criticized the Obama administration for not doing enough to resolve the foreclosure crisis.
The Democratic delegation has sent a letter to the president, asking him to take measures that housing groups have been pushing for ever since the financial crisis began. These measures include refinancing all mortgages owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and allowing principal write-downs of certain mortgages through bankruptcy protection in order to avoid foreclosures. The measures also include establishing a Homeowners’ Bill of Rights that would require the review of documents in a timely manner and include other changes that benefit homeowners.
Much of this criticism of the administration’s handling of the foreclosure crisis has to do with the fact that next year is an election year, and many of California's lawmakers are bound to face disgruntled voters. Some lawmakers, like those in the Central Valley district, may find this to be an especially difficult election, because these areas have been hit especially hard by foreclosures.
While the Obama administration has called on regulators who are currently overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allow more refinancing, it has rejected mandatory refinancing of all mortgages. Measures like this would add to the federal administration's already huge bailout bill.
The federal administration has responded to California lawmakers’ concerns by assuring them that the president is already taking measures to help struggling homeowners, especially those in states like California with a massive foreclosure crisis. The Hardest Hit Fund will be diverging funds to states that have the most foreclosures, including $2 billion to California.
The Democratic delegation has sent a letter to the president, asking him to take measures that housing groups have been pushing for ever since the financial crisis began. These measures include refinancing all mortgages owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and allowing principal write-downs of certain mortgages through bankruptcy protection in order to avoid foreclosures. The measures also include establishing a Homeowners’ Bill of Rights that would require the review of documents in a timely manner and include other changes that benefit homeowners.
Much of this criticism of the administration’s handling of the foreclosure crisis has to do with the fact that next year is an election year, and many of California's lawmakers are bound to face disgruntled voters. Some lawmakers, like those in the Central Valley district, may find this to be an especially difficult election, because these areas have been hit especially hard by foreclosures.
While the Obama administration has called on regulators who are currently overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allow more refinancing, it has rejected mandatory refinancing of all mortgages. Measures like this would add to the federal administration's already huge bailout bill.
The federal administration has responded to California lawmakers’ concerns by assuring them that the president is already taking measures to help struggling homeowners, especially those in states like California with a massive foreclosure crisis. The Hardest Hit Fund will be diverging funds to states that have the most foreclosures, including $2 billion to California.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Toyota’s Auto Safety Efforts Focus on Prevention of Teen, Senior-Related Accidents
With some of the worst years in its history just behind it, Toyota Motor Co. is battling to regain some of its reputation for safety by backing high-end research and developing partnerships with leading universities around the country. In January, the automaker announced that it would spend $50 million on its Collaborative Safety Research Center over the next five years.
The center, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, will focus on technologies to prevent accidents involving children, teenagers and seniors. Further, the company will invest heavily in research into accident prevention technologies and accident reconstruction.
Toyota continues to face hundreds of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits filed by San Fernando Valley car accident lawyers and involving sudden and unintended acceleration in its vehicles. Unintended acceleration was the primary factor in several Toyota recalls since 2009. However, the company has also announced a number of other recalls for a variety of safety issues. These recalls have severely damaged Toyota’s credibility and reputation. Toyota hopes that its new investments in auto safety efforts will diminish the damaging impact of its recent recalls.
The company has announced partnerships with some of the brightest minds in the engineering industry, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's AgeLab, the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Transportation Safety Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine and the Washtenaw Area Transportation Study. Additionally, Toyota researchers will also work together with researchers from the University of Michigan, the Children's Hospital Philadelphia as well as the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
One of the company’s major focuses as part of its auto safety efforts is researching the effectiveness of voice-activated communication systems in automobiles. In this effort, the company is partnering with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The company also wants to probe technologies to prevent accidents involving seniors and teen motorists, and ways to keep children safer in traffic accidents.
The center, located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, will focus on technologies to prevent accidents involving children, teenagers and seniors. Further, the company will invest heavily in research into accident prevention technologies and accident reconstruction.
Toyota continues to face hundreds of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits filed by San Fernando Valley car accident lawyers and involving sudden and unintended acceleration in its vehicles. Unintended acceleration was the primary factor in several Toyota recalls since 2009. However, the company has also announced a number of other recalls for a variety of safety issues. These recalls have severely damaged Toyota’s credibility and reputation. Toyota hopes that its new investments in auto safety efforts will diminish the damaging impact of its recent recalls.
The company has announced partnerships with some of the brightest minds in the engineering industry, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's AgeLab, the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Transportation Safety Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine and the Washtenaw Area Transportation Study. Additionally, Toyota researchers will also work together with researchers from the University of Michigan, the Children's Hospital Philadelphia as well as the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
One of the company’s major focuses as part of its auto safety efforts is researching the effectiveness of voice-activated communication systems in automobiles. In this effort, the company is partnering with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The company also wants to probe technologies to prevent accidents involving seniors and teen motorists, and ways to keep children safer in traffic accidents.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
California Company Announces Recall of Off-Road Motorcycles Due to Injury Risks
A company based in Murrieta, California has announced a recall of more than 6,000 off-road motorcycles because of the risks of fall accident hazards. The Consumer Product Safety Commission and KTM North America Inc. announced the recall.
The recall includes 6,117 off-road motorcycles because of the risk that the handlebar clamp can develop cracks while in use. This can cause the handlebars to move from position, posing a serious fall and accident hazard to a motorcyclist. The recall involves all 2011 KTM and Husaberg off-road motorcycles.
According to KTM North America, it has received at least one report of an accident caused because of this defect. In this incident, the handlebar clamps cracked, and handlebars were left unsecured. The motorcyclist was thrown off his vehicle, and received injuries that were serious enough for him to be hospitalized.
KTM bikes that are included in the recall come with the model name and the KTM logo on the right and left shrouds. The Husaberg motorcycles that are included in the recall include models FE and FX. These bikes were blue, yellow and white in color. These motorcycles were sold between April 2010 and May 2011. The motorcycles were manufactured in Austria.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission wants consumers to stop using the recalled motorcycles immediately, and contact KTM or Husaberg dealers immediately for free repairs.
Not all accidents that Los Angeles motorcycle accident lawyers come across are caused by the negligence of motorists. Many accidents every year are caused because of a defective component in the motorcycle. Besides defective handlebar clamps, there may be defects in the motorcycle tires and wheels. Motorcycle defects are even more dangerous than auto defects, because motorcyclists already have minimal protection preventing injuries in a motorcycle accident. Even a minor mechanical malfunction can cause the motorcyclist to be thrown off, resulting in a severe personal injuries or even wrongful death.
The recall includes 6,117 off-road motorcycles because of the risk that the handlebar clamp can develop cracks while in use. This can cause the handlebars to move from position, posing a serious fall and accident hazard to a motorcyclist. The recall involves all 2011 KTM and Husaberg off-road motorcycles.
According to KTM North America, it has received at least one report of an accident caused because of this defect. In this incident, the handlebar clamps cracked, and handlebars were left unsecured. The motorcyclist was thrown off his vehicle, and received injuries that were serious enough for him to be hospitalized.
KTM bikes that are included in the recall come with the model name and the KTM logo on the right and left shrouds. The Husaberg motorcycles that are included in the recall include models FE and FX. These bikes were blue, yellow and white in color. These motorcycles were sold between April 2010 and May 2011. The motorcycles were manufactured in Austria.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission wants consumers to stop using the recalled motorcycles immediately, and contact KTM or Husaberg dealers immediately for free repairs.
Not all accidents that Los Angeles motorcycle accident lawyers come across are caused by the negligence of motorists. Many accidents every year are caused because of a defective component in the motorcycle. Besides defective handlebar clamps, there may be defects in the motorcycle tires and wheels. Motorcycle defects are even more dangerous than auto defects, because motorcyclists already have minimal protection preventing injuries in a motorcycle accident. Even a minor mechanical malfunction can cause the motorcyclist to be thrown off, resulting in a severe personal injuries or even wrongful death.
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
What Can I Use My Probate Cash Advance for?
When a probate cash company offers you an advance on your inheritance, there are no restrictions on what you can use the money for. There are a number of reasons why a person might need a probate cash advance. For instance, there may be debts to clear, and mortgages to pay off. Sometimes, a person may be in line for a large inheritance, and might need cash to meet his daily expenses while he waits for the probate process to be completed.
California probate cash lawyers would not encourage persons to grab an inheritance cash advance without thinking about what exactly they need this money for. Your inheritance is a gift for you from the deceased, who likely spent much time and effort in determining that you were the best person to receive it. The last thing you want to do is run through it, and find that you have spent more of your inheritance than you're comfortable with, a few months down the line.
The bottom line is that any frivolous or irresponsible spending can be harmful for your future financial health. This is especially true if your inheritance isn't a very large-sized one to begin with. This may not be the right time to decide that you want an LED TV or some other equally unnecessary purchase.
While your California probate cash advance company will not stop you from spending your cash on whatever you like, it's highly advisable that you spend it on something that either makes money for you in the long run, or reduces your debt. For instance, you could use your probate cash advance to pay off your credit card debt. Another good idea would be to use your cash advance to fatten your retirement account.
California probate cash lawyers would not encourage persons to grab an inheritance cash advance without thinking about what exactly they need this money for. Your inheritance is a gift for you from the deceased, who likely spent much time and effort in determining that you were the best person to receive it. The last thing you want to do is run through it, and find that you have spent more of your inheritance than you're comfortable with, a few months down the line.
The bottom line is that any frivolous or irresponsible spending can be harmful for your future financial health. This is especially true if your inheritance isn't a very large-sized one to begin with. This may not be the right time to decide that you want an LED TV or some other equally unnecessary purchase.
While your California probate cash advance company will not stop you from spending your cash on whatever you like, it's highly advisable that you spend it on something that either makes money for you in the long run, or reduces your debt. For instance, you could use your probate cash advance to pay off your credit card debt. Another good idea would be to use your cash advance to fatten your retirement account.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
